U.S. patent number D502,302 [Application Number D/204,401] was granted by the patent office on 2005-02-22 for iron rest. This patent grant is currently assigned to Brabantia Nederland BV. Invention is credited to Antonius J. Verbeek.
United States Patent | D502,302 |
Verbeek | February 22, 2005 |
Inventors: | Verbeek; Antonius J. (Valkenswaard, NL) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Brabantia Nederland BV (Waalre,
NL) |
Appl. No.: | D/204,401 |
Filed: | April 27, 2004 |
Current U.S. Class: | D32/73 |
Current International Class: | 0705 |
Field of Search: | ;D32/66,68,73 ;38/106,107,141,142 ;108/28,29,6 ;248/117.1,117.2,117.3,117.4,117.5,117.6,117.7,153,172 |
2472676 | June 1949 | Nunnally, Sr. |
D452596 | December 2001 | de Wit |
19526637 | Jan 1997 | DE | |||
Amazon.com, Polder Dual Position Iron Rest featured on Polder 90455-44 Deluxe Ironing Board, [online], May 1, 2003 [retrieved on Sep. 25, 2004]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000095ZGA/. . . >.* . Amazon.com, Polder 90636-90H Iron Rest, [online] May 1, 2003 [retrieved on Sep. 5, 2004] Retrieved from the Internet .quadrature..quadrature.<URL: http://www.amazon.com/exe/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0000095ZGD/ . . . >.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.