U.S. patent number D499,209 [Application Number D/199,106] was granted by the patent office on 2004-11-30 for hair dryer. This patent grant is currently assigned to Daihatsu Industria e Comercio de Moveis e Aparelhos Electricos LTDA. Invention is credited to Roberto Jun Ikesaki.
United States Patent | D499,209 |
Ikesaki | November 30, 2004 |
Inventors: | Ikesaki; Roberto Jun (Sao Paulo, BR) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Daihatsu Industria e Comercio de
Moveis e Aparelhos Electricos LTDA (BR) |
Appl. No.: | D/199,106 |
Filed: | February 10, 2004 |
Sep 1, 2003 [BR] | DI 6303051 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D28/13 |
Current International Class: | 2803 |
Field of Search: | ;D28/12,13,15,16,18 ;34/96-101 ;392/380,383,384,385 |
D428528 | July 2000 | Deguines |
6285828 | September 2001 | Cafaro |
D454411 | March 2002 | Yeung |
D457266 | May 2002 | Yeung |
6389710 | May 2002 | Chou |
D460214 | July 2002 | Parodi |
D472672 | April 2003 | Altamore et al. |
Hong Kong Enterprise, Feb., 1993, p. 100, "Stylistic" hair dryer.* . White Oak Pharmacy, Mid-Aug. 2003-2004, p. 84, Conair hair dryers, [retrieved on May 10, 2004]. Retrieved from internet using Google Advanced Catalog Search, <URL: www.whiteoakpharmacy.com>.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.