U.S. patent number D498,888 [Application Number D/178,863] was granted by the patent office on 2004-11-23 for carpet cleaning dry powder spreader. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Hoover Company. Invention is credited to Matthew J. Archer, Douglas C. Barker.
United States Patent | D498,888 |
Archer , et al. | November 23, 2004 |
Inventors: | Archer; Matthew J. (North Canton, OH), Barker; Douglas C. (Canton, OH) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Hoover Company (North
Canton, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/178,863 |
Filed: | March 31, 2003 |
Current U.S. Class: | D32/25 |
Current International Class: | 1505 |
Field of Search: | ;D32/1,15,17-22,25,31 ;D8/61-62 ;D4/102 ;15/23,28,32,34 |
D111689 | October 1938 | Salt |
D116330 | August 1939 | Posch |
D171424 | February 1954 | Russell |
D214397 | June 1969 | Gantz |
D259388 | June 1981 | Merloni |
D346470 | April 1994 | Zahuranec et al. |
D416115 | November 1999 | Rohn et al. |
D425272 | May 2000 | Wareham |
Photograph of Kenmore Drytech Model C100-78850 purchased Nov., 1998. . Photograph of Kenmore (Singer) Dry Clean 'N Vac Machine Model No. 15.8753180 released May, 1984. . Photograph of Sebo Model No. DUO 24 purchased Mar., 2002.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.