Shoe

Description

FIG. 1 of the preferred embodiment is a front perspective view thereof;

FIG. 2 of the preferred embodiment is a rear perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 of the preferred embodiment is a right side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 4 of the preferred embodiment is a left side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 of the preferred embodiment is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 6 of the preferred embodiment is a rear elevational view thereof;

FIG. 7 of the preferred embodiment is a top plan view thereof; and,

FIG. 8 of the preferred embodiment is a bottom plan view thereof.

Claims

I claim the ornamental design for a shoe, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Werman; Jonathan (Lighthouse Point, FL)
Appl. No.:	D/182,357
Filed:	May 23, 2003

---

Current U.S. Class:	D2/923; D2/953
Current International Class:	0204
Field of Search:	;D2/896,923,924,953,954,951 ;36/83,112

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D170036	July 1953	Weiss
D255178	June 1980	Fuzita
D281543	December 1985	Nagano
D293385	December 1987	Famolare
5014041	May 1991	Rosen
D323922	February 1992	Emmert
D325286	April 1992	Biotteau
D355526	February 1995	Duclos
D367353	February 1996	Pyle
D391045	February 1998	Assous
D402795	December 1998	Moll et al.
D433790	November 2000	Oliver
D474880	May 2003	Cintron

Other References

A catalog of magazine reviews and professional endorsements regarding Rugged Shark products for 2002/2003 shows the shoe for which the design patent application was made was advertised Jan. 2003 in Sailing, in Dec. 2002 in Boating World, in Fall 2002 in Yachts & Brokerage. None of these occurred more than one year prior to the filing of the present application..

Primary Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Mann; Michael A. Nexsen Pruet Adams Kleemeier Centioni; Sara A.