Occlusive device
Solymar July 20, 2
U.S. patent number D493,223 [Application Number D/168,387] was granted by the patent office on 2004-07-20 for occlusive device. This patent grant is currently assigned to Carag AG. Invention is credited to Laszlo Solymar.
| United States Patent | D493,223 |
| Solymar | July 20, 2004 |
Occlusive device
Claims
The ornamental design for an occlusive device, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Solymar; Laszlo (Billdal, SE) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Carag AG (Baar,
CH) |
| Appl. No.: | D/168,387 |
| Filed: | October 1, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/143 |
| Current International Class: | 2402 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/143,155 ;623/3.1,3.16 ;606/194,195,151,213,215,191 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 5853420 | December 1998 | Chevillon et al. |
| 5855599 | January 1999 | Wan |
| 6488706 | December 2002 | Solymar |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Baniak Pine & Gannon
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an occlusive device according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 