Torch
Yang June 29, 2
U.S. patent number D492,432 [Application Number D/173,676] was granted by the patent office on 2004-06-29 for torch. Invention is credited to Manho Yang.
| United States Patent | D492,432 |
| Yang | June 29, 2004 |
Torch
Claims
The ornamental design for a torch, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Yang; Manho (Tangxia Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, CN) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/173,676 |
| Filed: | January 3, 2003 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Jul 4, 2002 [CN] | 02357773 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D26/37 |
| Current International Class: | 2602 |
| Field of Search: | ;D26/37-50 ;363/157,158,171,172,173,183-208 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D474551 | May 2003 | Gohl et al. |
| D475798 | June 2003 | Galli |
| D476103 | June 2003 | Galli |
| D479013 | August 2003 | Galli |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: RatnerPrestia
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevation view of a torch according to the principle of the present invention, the rear elevation view, the left view and the right view being identical to the front elevation view;
FIG. 2 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 