Hair iron
Cho May 4, 2
U.S. patent number D489,483 [Application Number D/170,878] was granted by the patent office on 2004-05-04 for hair iron. Invention is credited to Ok-Nam Cho.
| United States Patent | D489,483 |
| Cho | May 4, 2004 |
Hair iron
Claims
The ornamental design for a hair iron, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Cho; Ok-Nam (Gangbuk-gu, Seoul, KR) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/170,878 |
| Filed: | November 12, 2002 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| May 13, 2002 [KR] | 2002-13878 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D28/35 |
| Current International Class: | 2803 |
| Field of Search: | ;D28/35 ;132/223-225,269,271 ;219/222,225 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 6191387 | February 2001 | Smal |
| 6386206 | May 2002 | Lee |
| 2002/0036000 | March 2002 | Hirata et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Mathews, Collins, Shepherd & McKay, P.A.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 