U.S. patent number D487,822 [Application Number D/136,083] was granted by the patent office on 2004-03-23 for razor cartridge overcap. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Gillette Company. Invention is credited to Alejandro Lee.
United States Patent | D487,822 |
Lee | March 23, 2004 |
Inventors: | Lee; Alejandro (Cambridge, MA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Gillette Company (Boston,
MA) |
Appl. No.: | D/136,083 |
Filed: | January 24, 2001 |
Current U.S. Class: | D28/47 |
Current International Class: | 2803 |
Field of Search: | ;D28/44-47 ;30/32,34.05,35-40,40.1,40.2,47-60,60.5,61-74,74.1,75-84,526-541 |
2608756 | September 1952 | Jepson |
2744319 | May 1956 | Cutler |
D210713 | April 1968 | Hamill |
3609862 | October 1971 | Ernstberger |
4692986 | September 1987 | Motta et al. |
4709476 | December 1987 | Shurtleff et al. |
D294528 | March 1988 | Gray |
D296247 | June 1988 | Gray |
4777722 | October 1988 | Trotta |
4833779 | May 1989 | Iten |
D306216 | February 1990 | Gray |
4912846 | April 1990 | Yu |
4996772 | March 1991 | Iten |
5012578 | May 1991 | Siefer |
D345233 | March 1994 | Gray |
D407531 | March 1999 | Lee |
D440012 | April 2001 | Lee |
D443111 | May 2001 | Nakasuka |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.