Pourer device
Pierce January 6, 2
U.S. patent number D484,801 [Application Number D/166,306] was granted by the patent office on 2004-01-06 for pourer device. Invention is credited to Michael B. Pierce.
| United States Patent | D484,801 |
| Pierce | January 6, 2004 |
Pourer device
Claims
I claim the ornamental design for a pourer device, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Pierce; Michael B. (Minneapolis, MN) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/166,306 |
| Filed: | August 26, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/440; D9/447 |
| Current International Class: | 0907 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/425,447,439,440 ;220/705,709 ;215/388,902 ;D7/300,397 ;222/567 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D182940 | May 1958 | Williams |
| 3422998 | January 1969 | Murray |
| D468205 | January 2003 | Pierce |
Assistant Examiner: Andoll; Gregory
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bains; Herman H
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of novel pourer device, the other side being identical to the view shown;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view of the pourer device;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view of the pourer device; and,
FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the pourer device.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 