Belt pouch
Willows , et al. December 30, 2
U.S. patent number D484,307 [Application Number D/172,014] was granted by the patent office on 2003-12-30 for belt pouch. Invention is credited to June Angus, Antonio del Rosario, Keith Willows.
| United States Patent | D484,307 |
| Willows , et al. | December 30, 2003 |
Belt pouch
Claims
The ornamental design for a belt pouch, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Willows; Keith (Seattle, WA), del Rosario; Antonio (Bellevue, WA), Angus; June (Seattle, WA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/172,014 |
| Filed: | December 3, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/226 |
| Current International Class: | 0301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D3/226,224,215,221,228,232-238 ;224/904,901,240,269,684,683,241,914 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D448925 | October 2001 | Willows et al. |
| D458021 | June 2002 | Willows et al. |
| D459876 | July 2002 | Smith |
| D465323 | November 2002 | Dancyger |
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of our belt pouch design;
FIG. 2 is a right side view, the left side being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 