Lawn mower blade
Lancaster November 25, 2
U.S. patent number D482,700 [Application Number D/157,321] was granted by the patent office on 2003-11-25 for lawn mower blade. Invention is credited to Wilburn Boland Lancaster.
| United States Patent | D482,700 |
| Lancaster | November 25, 2003 |
Lawn mower blade
Claims
The ornamental design for a lawn mower blade, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lancaster; Wilburn Boland (Woodland, MS) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/157,321 |
| Filed: | May 8, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D15/17 |
| Current International Class: | 1503 |
| Field of Search: | ;D15/10,11,17,32 ;30/276,347,390 ;56/255,289,295,17.5 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D299348 | January 1989 | Nja |
| 5019113 | May 1991 | Burnell |
| D357691 | April 1995 | Bryant |
| D449054 | October 2001 | Neuerburg |
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a lawn mower blade showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 5 is an opposite side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6 is an end view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is an opposite end view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 