Roaster
Yeh November 25, 2
U.S. patent number D482,561 [Application Number D/172,777] was granted by the patent office on 2003-11-25 for roaster. Invention is credited to Jui-Ju Yeh.
| United States Patent | D482,561 |
| Yeh | November 25, 2003 |
Roaster
Claims
The ornamental design for a roaster, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Yeh; Jui-Ju (Taipei, TW) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/172,777 |
| Filed: | December 18, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/332 |
| Current International Class: | 0702 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/332-337,402-404 ;126/25R,25A,25AA,41R,29-30,9R,9A,9B,8 ;99/419,421R |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D295135 | April 1988 | Ogden |
| D325318 | April 1992 | Parent et al. |
| D351308 | October 1994 | Pai |
| D381241 | July 1997 | Pai |
| D463709 | October 2002 | Bossler |
| D471396 | March 2003 | Chiang |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Rabin & Berdo, P.C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front-left-top perspective view of a roaster, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 