Dental hygiene center
Page , et al. November 18, 2
U.S. patent number D482,451 [Application Number D/170,702] was granted by the patent office on 2003-11-18 for dental hygiene center. Invention is credited to Bliss Essence Page, William Clark Page.
| United States Patent | D482,451 |
| Page , et al. | November 18, 2003 |
Dental hygiene center
Claims
The ornamental design for a dental hygiene center, as shown.
| Inventors: | Page; Bliss Essence (Oxnard, CA), Page; William Clark (Oxnard, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/170,702 |
| Filed: | November 12, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/176 |
| Current International Class: | 2404 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/176 ;206/362.2,362.3,209.1 ;132/310,308,39,309 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D351661 | October 1994 | Fischer |
| 5860522 | January 1999 | Lee |
| D441090 | April 2001 | Broyles |
| D444567 | July 2001 | Tang |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Furr; Jeffrey
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a dental hygiene center showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a back elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is top view thereof;
FIG. 4 is back view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a front view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 