U.S. patent number D481,067 [Application Number D/161,901] was granted by the patent office on 2003-10-21 for laser printable card badge sheet. This patent grant is currently assigned to Temtec, Inc.. Invention is credited to David Haas.
United States Patent | D481,067 |
Haas | October 21, 2003 |
Inventors: | Haas; David (Suffern, NY) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Temtec, Inc. (Suffern,
NY) |
Appl. No.: | D/161,901 |
Filed: | June 6, 2002 |
Current U.S. Class: | D19/2; D19/1 |
Current International Class: | 1901 |
Field of Search: | ;D19/1,2,3,26,27,33 ;D20/22,27 ;D11/95 ;40/1.5,638,641 ;101/369 ;283/81,101,103,105 ;428/40.1,42.2,42.3 ;206/216 ;242/270 ;221/13 |
3487977 | January 1970 | Andersson |
3501365 | March 1970 | Marshall |
4060168 | November 1977 | Romagnoli |
4061808 | December 1977 | Sato |
4210688 | July 1980 | Sato |
4584219 | April 1986 | Baartmans |
4813571 | March 1989 | Slagter |
4925716 | May 1990 | Haas |
5662976 | September 1997 | Popat et al. |
D386793 | November 1997 | Haas et al. |
D419184 | January 2000 | Haas et al. |
6037029 | March 2000 | Instance |
6197396 | March 2001 | Haas et al. |
6224110 | May 2001 | Ambridge et al. |
D445128 | July 2001 | Haas et al. |
RE37764 | June 2002 | Good |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.