Flavored pacifier
Kroepel July 15, 2
U.S. patent number D477,411 [Application Number D/167,482] was granted by the patent office on 2003-07-15 for flavored pacifier. Invention is credited to Amy Louise Kroepel.
| United States Patent | D477,411 |
| Kroepel | July 15, 2003 |
Flavored pacifier
Claims
The ornamental design for a flavored pacifier, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Kroepel; Amy Louise (Escondido, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/167,482 |
| Filed: | September 16, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/194 |
| Current International Class: | 2404 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/193,194 ;606/234,235,236 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D221267 | July 1971 | Herbst |
| D231033 | March 1974 | Sofro |
| 3924621 | December 1975 | Cassimally |
| D387868 | December 1997 | Wilburn |
| D404137 | January 1999 | Underwood et al. |
| 6041950 | March 2000 | Soehnlein |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Mikesell; Richard L.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a flavored pacifier, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 