Cross
Garcia May 27, 2
U.S. patent number D475,170 [Application Number D/166,383] was granted by the patent office on 2003-05-27 for cross. Invention is credited to Philip Martin Garcia.
| United States Patent | D475,170 |
| Garcia | May 27, 2003 |
Cross
Claims
The ornamental design for a cross, as shown.
| Inventors: | Garcia; Philip Martin (Jefferson City, MO) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/166,383 |
| Filed: | August 27, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D99/27 |
| Current International Class: | 1102 |
| Field of Search: | ;D99/27,37 ;D11/37,53,81,96,97,99,121,101 ;63/18,19,21 ;428/3 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D242818 | December 1976 | Wood |
| D245679 | September 1977 | Parkison |
| D249899 | October 1978 | Nally |
| D435712 | December 2000 | Knudsen |
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of the cross of this design showing characteristic features of the unique design of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a top view of the cross;
FIG. 3 is a bottom view of the cross of this design;
FIG. 4 is a back view of the cross of this design;
FIG. 5 is an end view of the cross;
FIG. 6 is an end view of the cross; and,
FIG. 7 is an isometric view of the cross of this invention.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 