U.S. patent number D474,366 [Application Number D/162,253] was granted by the patent office on 2003-05-13 for coffee machine. This patent grant is currently assigned to Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.. Invention is credited to Christopher Drake, Kevin Hodges.
United States Patent | D474,366 |
Hodges , et al. | May 13, 2003 |
Inventors: | Hodges; Kevin (Leicester, GB), Drake; Christopher (Leicester, GB) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Societe des Produits Nestle
S.A. (Vevey, CH) |
Appl. No.: | D/162,253 |
Filed: | June 10, 2002 |
Current U.S. Class: | D7/309; D7/311 |
Current International Class: | 0701 |
Field of Search: | ;D7/300,309,310,311,306 ;99/282,280,283,285,307,279 |
D185833 | August 1959 | Bruntjen |
D324465 | March 1992 | Ratzlaff |
D336003 | June 1993 | Rocca et al. |
D350667 | September 1994 | Saltet |
D371037 | June 1996 | De Felip |
D373279 | September 1996 | Chen |
D380928 | July 1997 | Trybus |
D418001 | December 1999 | van der Veen |
D419823 | February 2000 | Choi |
D444986 | July 2001 | Smith et al. |
D448049 | September 2001 | Podgorney et al. |
D453088 | January 2002 | Bell et al. |
D453656 | February 2002 | Byler et al. |
D454023 | March 2002 | Wang |
D454464 | March 2002 | Mogler et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.