U.S. patent number D474,312 [Application Number D/153,792] was granted by the patent office on 2003-05-06 for robotic vacuum cleaner. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Hoover Company. Invention is credited to Shai Abramson, Matthew J. Archer, Oded Davidovitch, Shalom Levin, Ronald J. Stephens, Yoav Tikochinsky.
United States Patent | D474,312 |
Stephens , et al. | May 6, 2003 |
Inventors: | Stephens; Ronald J. (Rittman, OH), Archer; Matthew J. (North Canton, OH), Abramson; Shai (Pardesia, IL), Levin; Shalom (Alitit, IL), Davidovitch; Oded (Tel-Aviv, IL), Tikochinsky; Yoav (Tel-Aviv, IL) |
---|---|
Assignee: | The Hoover Company (North
Canton, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/153,792 |
Filed: | January 11, 2002 |
Current U.S. Class: | D32/21 |
Current International Class: | 1505 |
Field of Search: | ;D32/21,23-24,31,25 ;15/327.1,319,340.1,340.3 ;180/169,8.2 ;901/1 |
D212257 | September 1968 | Schaefer et al. |
4306329 | December 1981 | Yokoi |
5109566 | May 1992 | Kobayashi et al. |
5144716 | September 1992 | Watanabe et al. |
5293955 | March 1994 | Lee |
5353468 | October 1994 | Yap et al. |
5515934 | May 1996 | Davis |
5781960 | July 1998 | Kilstrom et al. |
5940927 | August 1999 | Haegermarck et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.