U.S. patent number D473,813 [Application Number D/150,604] was granted by the patent office on 2003-04-29 for lapel pin/eyeglass holder. Invention is credited to Kay L. Johnson, Jacklyn A. Titus.
United States Patent | D473,813 |
Titus , et al. | April 29, 2003 |
Inventors: | Titus; Jacklyn A. (Oklahoma City, OK), Johnson; Kay L. (Oklahoma City, OK) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/150,604 |
Filed: | November 6, 2001 |
Current U.S. Class: | D11/66 |
Current International Class: | 1101 |
Field of Search: | ;D11/1,2,40-50,54,57,58,61,65,66,77,79-83,95-102,107,110,116 ;63/13,18,19,20,23 ;70/456B,456R |
D129851 | October 1941 | Philippe |
D378904 | April 1997 | Sciuto |
D392912 | March 1998 | Roos et al. |
D394822 | June 1998 | Swenson et al. |
D455978 | April 2002 | Brown |
Photographs of Lapel Pin in existence before Nov. 6, 2001 (front and backside). . Photographs of Lapel Pin in existence before Nov. 6, 2001 (front and backside). . Photographs of Lapel Pin in existence before Nov. 6, 2001 (front and backside). . Photographs of Lapel Pin in existence before Nov. 6, 2001 (front and backside). . Photographs of Lapel Pin in existence before Nov. 6, 2001 (front and backside).. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.