Roaster
Ragan , et al. April 8, 2
U.S. patent number D472,758 [Application Number D/153,708] was granted by the patent office on 2003-04-08 for roaster. Invention is credited to Adam Barrera, Gary Ragan.
| United States Patent | D472,758 |
| Ragan , et al. | April 8, 2003 |
Roaster
Claims
The ornamental design for a roaster, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Ragan; Gary (Lebanon, NJ), Barrera; Adam (Prospect SA 5082, AU) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/153,708 |
| Filed: | January 11, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/352 |
| Current International Class: | 0702 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/323,352-361,337,350.1 ;99/324,339,340,372,378,385,375,341 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D437727 | February 2001 | Gruaz |
Other References
|
Cook's Essentials, Griller's Choice Electric Grill., Model MG240, Owner's Manual & Recipe Guide, Jul. 1999, pp. 1-22.. |
Primary Examiner: Veynar; Caron D.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal
Description
FIG. 1 is a frontal view of one embodiment of the roaster.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the roaster.
FIG. 3 is a top view of the roaster; and,
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the roaster.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 