U.S. patent number D471,865 [Application Number D/154,948] was granted by the patent office on 2003-03-18 for removable battery terminal connector. This patent grant is currently assigned to Senco Products, Inc.. Invention is credited to Steven M. Dickinson, Conrad A. Garvis, Richard L. Leimbach.
United States Patent | D471,865 |
Garvis , et al. | March 18, 2003 |
Inventors: | Garvis; Conrad A. (Mason, OH), Leimbach; Richard L. (Cincinnati, OH), Dickinson; Steven M. (Cincinnati, OH) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Senco Products, Inc.
(Cincinnati, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/154,948 |
Filed: | February 1, 2002 |
Current U.S. Class: | D13/120 |
Current International Class: | 1302 |
Field of Search: | ;D13/120,133,146,147,103 ;439/500,660,733.1,79 |
5221210 | June 1993 | Bormuth et al. |
5551883 | September 1996 | Davis |
5674078 | October 1997 | Davis et al. |
D413564 | September 1999 | Hershberger et al. |
D415100 | October 1999 | Buck |
5977746 | November 1999 | Hershberger et al. |
6057608 | May 2000 | Bailey, Jr. et al. |
D436917 | January 2001 | Hayakawa et al. |
D456002 | April 2002 | Kato et al. |
6454575 | September 2002 | Jones et al. |
2001/0021609 | September 2001 | Chaing |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.