Thermostat
Peabody March 18, 2
U.S. patent number D471,825 [Application Number D/155,543] was granted by the patent office on 2003-03-18 for thermostat. Invention is credited to Steven R. Peabody.
| United States Patent | D471,825 |
| Peabody | March 18, 2003 |
Thermostat
Claims
The ornamental design for a thermostat, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Peabody; Steven R. (Zionsville, IN) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/155,543 |
| Filed: | February 13, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D10/50 |
| Current International Class: | 1004 |
| Field of Search: | ;D10/49,50 ;200/343 ;236/46R,47,49.3,51,84,94 ;361/680,681 ;400/495 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D288670 | March 1987 | Steiner |
| D390482 | February 1998 | Pasquarette |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Huff; Richard L.
Description
FIG. 1 is an elevational perspective view of a thermostat;
FIG. 2 is a front view of the thermostat;
FIG. 3 is a rear view of the thermostat;
FIG. 4 is a side view of the thermostat;
FIG. 5 is a top view of the thermostat; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom view of the thermostat.
The broken line showing is for illustrative purposes only and forms no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 