U.S. patent number D471,276 [Application Number D/140,673] was granted by the patent office on 2003-03-04 for tongue and tooth cleaning device. Invention is credited to Dasan Potti.
United States Patent | D471,276 |
Potti | March 4, 2003 |
Inventors: | Potti; Dasan (Salisbury, MD) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/140,673 |
Filed: | April 23, 2001 |
Current U.S. Class: | D24/147 |
Current International Class: | 2402 |
Field of Search: | ;D24/147 ;D28/68,65,66,64.4,64.3 ;606/161 ;15/111 ;132/323 |
2735436 | February 1956 | Russo |
D221036 | June 1971 | Potti |
4041962 | August 1977 | Johansson et al. |
D276088 | October 1984 | Fong |
4790336 | December 1988 | Kuo |
5184719 | February 1993 | Gordon |
D338084 | August 1993 | Potti |
5280797 | January 1994 | Fry |
5438726 | August 1995 | Leite |
D374744 | October 1996 | Dolan et al. |
D384153 | September 1997 | Potti et al. |
D392386 | March 1998 | Nguyen |
5735298 | April 1998 | Mayne et al. |
5845358 | December 1998 | Woloch |
D408534 | April 1999 | Jansheski |
5916228 | June 1999 | Ripich et al. |
5975296 | November 1999 | Dolan et al. |
6083235 | July 2000 | Wagner |
6171323 | January 2001 | Potti et al. |
6257252 | July 2001 | Hall |
D447238 | August 2001 | Tang |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.