Garden hose
McLean January 28, 2
U.S. patent number D469,520 [Application Number D/154,628] was granted by the patent office on 2003-01-28 for garden hose. Invention is credited to Donald F. McLean.
| United States Patent | D469,520 |
| McLean | January 28, 2003 |
Garden hose
Claims
The ornamental design for a garden hose, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | McLean; Donald F. (Oak Park, IL) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/154,628 |
| Filed: | January 24, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D23/266 |
| Current International Class: | 2301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/266 ;138/118,118.1,121,122 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D381405 | July 1997 | Waidele et al. |
| D413657 | September 1999 | Lidgett |
| D425184 | May 2000 | Lidgett |
| 6308741 | October 2001 | Payne |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McKenna; Michael R.
Description
The file of this patent contains at least one drawing executed in color photograph. Copies of thes patent with color photograph (s) will be provided by the office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
FIG. 1 is a photographic perspective view of the garden hose of the current invention.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 