U.S. patent number D468,751 [Application Number D/151,918] was granted by the patent office on 2003-01-14 for engine shroud. This patent grant is currently assigned to Tecumseh Products Company. Invention is credited to Thomas A. Immel, Brian D. Neeley.
United States Patent | D468,751 |
Neeley , et al. | January 14, 2003 |
Inventors: | Neeley; Brian D. (New Holstein, WI), Immel; Thomas A. (Malone, WI) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Tecumseh Products Company
(Tecumseh, MI) |
Appl. No.: | D/151,918 |
Filed: | December 11, 2001 |
Current U.S. Class: | D15/1 |
Current International Class: | 1501 |
Field of Search: | ;D15/1 ;123/5A,156BA,306,56,41.7,198E,661,667 ;D34/15 ;46/39,78,249 |
D305432 | January 1990 | Hashigaki |
D307147 | April 1990 | Sasaki et al. |
D330897 | November 1992 | Carlson et al. |
D352042 | November 1994 | Davies, III |
D352043 | November 1994 | Davies, III |
D353381 | December 1994 | Yoshida et al. |
D353382 | December 1994 | Keyooka et al. |
D367070 | February 1996 | Maeda et al. |
D396045 | July 1998 | Neeley |
D397342 | August 1998 | Shimizu |
D398010 | September 1998 | Yoshida et al. |
D416265 | November 1999 | Kato et al. |
D453522 | February 2002 | Maeda et al. |
D457891 | May 2002 | Matre |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.