Portion of a shoe upper
Wilson January 14, 2
U.S. patent number D468,521 [Application Number D/165,265] was granted by the patent office on 2003-01-14 for portion of a shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II. Invention is credited to Ralph Davis Wilson.
| United States Patent | D468,521 |
| Wilson | January 14, 2003 |
Portion of a shoe upper
Claims
The ornamental design for a portion of a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Wilson; Ralph Davis (Torrance, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II
(Manhattan Beach, CA) |
| Appl. No.: | D/165,265 |
| Filed: | August 15, 2002 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160050 | May 3, 2002 | ||||
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/975; D2/972 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/896,902,907,943,946,969,972,973,975 ;36/45,50.1,51,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-130 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D158953 | June 1950 | Gillis |
| 3626610 | December 1971 | Dassler |
| D253017 | October 1979 | Marchesi |
| 4377913 | March 1983 | Stone |
| 4616432 | October 1986 | Bunch |
| D294422 | March 1988 | Gamm |
| 4733439 | March 1988 | Gentry |
| 4811497 | March 1989 | Merino Ciudad |
| D324939 | March 1992 | Hatfield |
| D332001 | December 1992 | Bayer |
| 5307569 | May 1994 | Melcher |
| D351723 | October 1994 | Bevier |
| D357794 | May 1995 | Avar |
| D370554 | June 1996 | Greene |
| D370994 | June 1996 | Avar |
| D375194 | November 1996 | Teague |
| D377410 | January 1997 | Crowley |
| D379557 | June 1997 | Pratt |
| D385998 | November 1997 | Clegg |
| D386604 | November 1997 | Cass |
| D388244 | December 1997 | Serna |
| 5701688 | December 1997 | Crowley |
| D394742 | June 1998 | Gaudio |
| D397543 | September 1998 | Silvers |
| D397862 | September 1998 | Aird |
| D400700 | November 1998 | Aird |
| D404554 | January 1999 | Kelchak |
| D404904 | February 1999 | Greenberg |
| D421835 | March 2000 | Akhidime |
| D422128 | April 2000 | Adler |
| D422403 | April 2000 | Heaslet |
| D423208 | April 2000 | Cass |
| D424290 | May 2000 | Lamprou |
| D426372 | June 2000 | Price |
| D431713 | October 2000 | Wilson |
| D432292 | October 2000 | Kim |
| D432776 | October 2000 | McDowell |
| D435162 | December 2000 | Wilson |
| D435717 | January 2001 | Bettencourt |
| D439734 | April 2001 | Wilson |
| D444622 | July 2001 | Wilson |
| D444623 | July 2001 | Wilson |
| D444624 | July 2001 | Wilson |
| D444937 | July 2001 | Wilson |
| D446000 | August 2001 | Price |
| D448550 | October 2001 | Yang |
| D451271 | December 2001 | Gerber |
| D452070 | December 2001 | Holmes |
| D455250 | April 2002 | Wilson |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lerner, Esq.; Marshall A. Mattes, Esq.; Bradford E. Kleinberg & Lerner, LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the portion of a shoe upper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a front elevational view thereof.
Broken lines in the figures are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 