Dog collar
Huber January 7, 2
U.S. patent number D468,491 [Application Number D/158,356] was granted by the patent office on 2003-01-07 for dog collar. Invention is credited to Lori Huber.
| United States Patent | D468,491 |
| Huber | January 7, 2003 |
Dog collar
Claims
The ornamental design for a dog collar, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Huber; Lori (Seattle, WA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/158,356 |
| Filed: | April 2, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D30/152; D2/601; D28/41 |
| Current International Class: | 3004 |
| Field of Search: | ;D30/152-153 ;119/850,855,856,862 ;D11/20,120,119,3-6 ;D2/600,601,891,741 ;D28/39,41 ;2/174 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2216440 | October 1940 | Houle |
| D424255 | May 2000 | Bionde et al. |
| D439374 | March 2001 | Martin |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Seed IP Law Group PLLC
Description
FIG. 1 is an isometric view of a dog collar showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a plan view of the dog collar of FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 3 is an elevational view of the dog collar of FIG. 1.
The broken lines in FIG. 1 are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 