Tailpipe
Yu December 17, 2
U.S. patent number D467,210 [Application Number D/160,936] was granted by the patent office on 2002-12-17 for tailpipe. Invention is credited to Wen-Cheng Yu.
| United States Patent | D467,210 |
| Yu | December 17, 2002 |
Tailpipe
Claims
The ornamental design for a tailpipe, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Yu; Wen-Cheng (Yung Kang City, Tainan Hsien, TW) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/160,936 |
| Filed: | May 21, 2002 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/194 |
| Current International Class: | 1216 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/194 ;D15/5 ;181/227,228,247-249,264,282,239-241 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D220165 | March 1971 | Trainor |
| D384319 | September 1997 | Harutiunian |
| D397661 | September 1998 | Harutiunian |
| 6085863 | July 2000 | Shuen |
| D458570 | June 2002 | Wang |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Rosenberg, Klein & Lee
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a tailpipe showing my present design;
FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 