Double hanging rack
Chang December 3, 2
U.S. patent number D466,331 [Application Number D/152,193] was granted by the patent office on 2002-12-03 for double hanging rack. This patent grant is currently assigned to Fashion 21, Inc.. Invention is credited to Do Won Chang.
| United States Patent | D466,331 |
| Chang | December 3, 2002 |
Double hanging rack
Claims
The ornamental design for a double hanging rack, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Chang; Do Won (Beverly Hills, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Fashion 21, Inc. (Los Angeles,
CA) |
| Appl. No.: | D/152,193 |
| Filed: | December 11, 2001 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/681.1 |
| Current International Class: | 0604 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/410,411,413,415 ;211/204,205,206,85.3,123 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 5617962 | April 1997 | Chen |
| 5718344 | February 1998 | Joldeson et al. |
| D450948 | November 2001 | Stafford et al. |
| D451300 | December 2001 | Stafford et al. |
| 6390311 | May 2002 | Belokin |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of the invention; and,
FIG. 2 is a front view of the invention.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 