Exerciser for orifice muscles
Bloch November 19, 2
U.S. patent number D465,852 [Application Number D/054,384] was granted by the patent office on 2002-11-19 for exerciser for orifice muscles. Invention is credited to Stuart A. Bloch.
| United States Patent | D465,852 |
| Bloch | November 19, 2002 |
Exerciser for orifice muscles
Claims
The ornamental design for a exerciser for orifice muscles, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Bloch; Stuart A. (Tinton Falls, NJ) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/054,384 |
| Filed: | May 13, 1996 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/211; D24/214 |
| Current International Class: | 2803 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/214,211,200 ;601/118,120,121,133-137 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D271051 | October 1983 | McCoy et al. |
| D272649 | February 1984 | Bloch |
| D272650 | February 1984 | Bloch |
| D337827 | July 1993 | Seng |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Skolnik; Robert M.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of an exerciser for orifice muscles, showing my new design with all other sides being identical to that shown;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 