U.S. patent number D464,629 [Application Number D/148,922] was granted by the patent office on 2002-10-22 for dual control slide dimmer. This patent grant is currently assigned to Pass & Seymour, Inc.. Invention is credited to David Dowd, Dejan Radosavljevic, Kenneth Vought.
United States Patent | D464,629 |
Dowd , et al. | October 22, 2002 |
Inventors: | Dowd; David (North Syracuse, NY), Radosavljevic; Dejan (LaFayette, NY), Vought; Kenneth (Tully, NY) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Pass & Seymour, Inc.
(Syracuse, NY) |
Appl. No.: | D/148,922 |
Filed: | September 28, 2001 |
Current U.S. Class: | D13/170 |
Current International Class: | 1303 |
Field of Search: | ;D8/350,353 ;D13/162,170,171 ;200/16D,547-551,553,563,241,252,329,330 ;307/112,115,125 ;338/62,74,152,163,184,198-200 ;301/600,627 ;315/291 |
D241853 | October 1976 | Spira |
4131870 | December 1978 | Hilgendorf et al. |
4196406 | April 1980 | Salem |
D325567 | April 1992 | Jacoby, Jr. et al. |
D329635 | September 1992 | Tsai |
D336744 | June 1993 | Kahn et al. |
D380451 | July 1997 | Krajci et al. |
D384038 | September 1997 | Ko |
D405061 | February 1999 | Thomas |
D436934 | January 2001 | Hayduke et al. |
D437584 | February 2001 | Radosavljevic et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.