U.S. patent number D464,325 [Application Number D/147,716] was granted by the patent office on 2002-10-15 for protective coupler for electrical extension cords. Invention is credited to Daniel J. Peters, James C. Peters.
United States Patent | D464,325 |
Peters , et al. | October 15, 2002 |
Inventors: | Peters; James C. (East Islip, NY), Peters; Daniel J. (East Islip, NY) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/147,716 |
Filed: | September 4, 2001 |
Current U.S. Class: | D13/156 |
Current International Class: | 1303 |
Field of Search: | ;D13/152-156,184,199 ;174/73.1,92,93,135,138F ;439/367,369 |
585707 | July 1897 | Schwedtmann |
3048810 | August 1962 | Steen |
3059209 | October 1962 | Bird |
3068316 | December 1962 | Witt |
4797509 | January 1989 | Cook |
4927377 | May 1990 | Bach et al. |
D319217 | August 1991 | Fujoka |
5069634 | December 1991 | Chiarolanzio |
D332940 | February 1993 | Finlay |
5259782 | November 1993 | Giffin |
5743752 | April 1998 | Masselbeuf |
5826531 | October 1998 | Havnaer, Jr. |
D404722 | January 1999 | Chen |
D407377 | March 1999 | Landerholm et al. |
5980278 | November 1999 | Winkler |
D419528 | January 2000 | Hakoda |
D430850 | September 2000 | Alves et al. |
D452139 | December 2001 | Murata |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.