U.S. patent number D462,249 [Application Number D/150,468] was granted by the patent office on 2002-09-03 for keyless drill chuck. This patent grant is currently assigned to TechTronic Industries Co., LTD. Invention is credited to Meily Siu Mei Chan, Benson Chun Kit Cheung, Daniel A. Chunn, Felix Hei Shun Leung.
United States Patent | D462,249 |
Chunn , et al. | September 3, 2002 |
Inventors: | Chunn; Daniel A. (Hong Kong, CN), Chan; Meily Siu Mei (Hong Kong, CN), Leung; Felix Hei Shun (Hong Kong, CN), Cheung; Benson Chun Kit (Hong Kong, CN) |
---|---|
Assignee: | TechTronic Industries Co., LTD
(Hong Kong, CN) |
Appl. No.: | D/150,468 |
Filed: | November 5, 2001 |
Current U.S. Class: | D8/70; D15/140 |
Current International Class: | 0805 |
Field of Search: | ;D8/70,68,69 ;D15/140 ;279/60,61,62,63,64,65,66,157,901,902 ;408/56,240 |
D346541 | May 1994 | Somers |
D356932 | April 1995 | Owens et al. |
D359217 | June 1995 | Owens et al. |
D361076 | August 1995 | Shadeck et al. |
D386193 | November 1997 | Steadings |
D400418 | November 1998 | Lui |
D404988 | February 1999 | Long |
D423315 | April 2000 | Robson |
D426442 | June 2000 | Long |
6102411 | August 2000 | Wilson |
6186516 | February 2001 | Miles et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.