Food cutter
Law August 13, 2
U.S. patent number D461,380 [Application Number D/146,583] was granted by the patent office on 2002-08-13 for food cutter. Invention is credited to Yung Kai Law.
| United States Patent | D461,380 |
| Law | August 13, 2002 |
Food cutter
Claims
The ornamental design for a food cutter, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Law; Yung Kai (Tuen Mun, N.T., HK) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/146,583 |
| Filed: | August 10, 2001 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Feb 15, 2001 [GB] | 2099539 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/694 |
| Current International Class: | 0706 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/694 ;D8/98 ;D3/18 ;30/306,307,319,314,315,292,299 ;16/110.1,430,431 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 482830 | September 1892 | Morgan |
| 900300 | October 1908 | Nicolas |
| D318209 | July 1991 | Boxman |
| 5101564 | April 1992 | Melter |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Carmody & Torrance LLP
Description
FIGS. 1 and 2 are perspective views of a food cutter showing my new design;
FIG. 3 is a right side view thereof, the left side view is identical to the right side view in mirror image;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 