Massaging pet brush
O'Rourke May 28, 2
U.S. patent number D457,989 [Application Number D/142,990] was granted by the patent office on 2002-05-28 for massaging pet brush. Invention is credited to Anthony L. O'Rourke.
| United States Patent | D457,989 |
| O'Rourke | May 28, 2002 |
Massaging pet brush
Claims
The ornamental design of a massaging pet brush, as shown.
| Inventors: | O'Rourke; Anthony L. (Malibu, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/142,990 |
| Filed: | June 5, 2001 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D30/158 |
| Current International Class: | 3099 |
| Field of Search: | ;D30/158,159 ;D4/136,124,125 ;D1/106,107,109 ;119/600,611,612,615,616,632 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D321434 | November 1991 | Strickler |
| D330977 | November 1992 | Otis |
| D356685 | March 1995 | Bertwell |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lyon & Lyon LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view from the top left of the massaging pet brush of my new design;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view from the top right thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a bottom view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a top plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 