Dispenser for bottle
Chin April 30, 2
U.S. patent number D456,258 [Application Number D/142,458] was granted by the patent office on 2002-04-30 for dispenser for bottle. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Procter & Gamble Company. Invention is credited to Henry Young Chin.
| United States Patent | D456,258 |
| Chin | April 30, 2002 |
Dispenser for bottle
Claims
The ornamental design for a dispenser for bottle, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Chin; Henry Young (Portland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Procter & Gamble
Company (Cincinnati, OH) |
| Appl. No.: | D/142,458 |
| Filed: | May 25, 2001 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/435 |
| Current International Class: | 0907 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/434,435,443 ;220/200 ;222/200 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D436864 | January 2001 | Slater |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Krebs; Jay A. Weirich; David M. Patel; Ken K.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view from front, below and right side;
FIG. 2 is a plan view from the front;
FIG. 3 is a view from rear;
FIG. 4 is a view from left side;
FIG. 5 is a view from above; and,
FIG. 6 is a view from below.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 