Cap
Bakic April 30, 2
U.S. patent number D456,257 [Application Number D/136,292] was granted by the patent office on 2002-04-30 for cap. This patent grant is currently assigned to Dieter Bakic Design S.R.L.. Invention is credited to Dieter Bakic.
| United States Patent | D456,257 |
| Bakic | April 30, 2002 |
Cap
Claims
The ornamental design for a cap, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Bakic; Dieter (Milan, IT) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Dieter Bakic Design S.R.L.
(IT) |
| Appl. No.: | D/136,292 |
| Filed: | January 29, 2001 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Jul 27, 2000 [XH] | DM/052 937 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/435; D9/454 |
| Current International Class: | 0907 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/434,435,454 ;222/541.1,541.5,541.6 ;215/45,217,200,901 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D182235 | March 1958 | Jaffe |
| 3419172 | December 1968 | Lee |
| D407979 | April 1999 | Zemio |
| D448294 | September 2001 | Alscher et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Cantor Colburn LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a bottom view of a cap, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a top view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 