Air flow generator
Van Brunt February 12, 2
U.S. patent number D453,560 [Application Number D/123,004] was granted by the patent office on 2002-02-12 for air flow generator. This patent grant is currently assigned to American Biosystems, Inc.. Invention is credited to Nicholas P. Van Brunt.
| United States Patent | D453,560 |
| Van Brunt | February 12, 2002 |
Air flow generator
Claims
The ornamental design for an air flow generator, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Van Brunt; Nicholas P. (White Bear Lake, MN) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | American Biosystems, Inc. (St.
Paul, MN) |
| Appl. No.: | D/123,004 |
| Filed: | May 8, 2000 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D23/355 |
| Current International Class: | 2304 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/355 ;55/467 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4856968 | August 1989 | Armbruster |
| D386564 | November 1997 | Mycroft |
| D400239 | October 1998 | Miller et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kinney & Lange
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view;
FIG. 2 is a front view;
FIG. 3 is a rear view;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevational view;
FIG. 5 is a right side elevational view;
FIG. 6 is a top elevational view; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom elevational view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 