U.S. patent number D444,994 [Application Number D/133,274] was granted by the patent office on 2001-07-17 for cooker. This patent grant is currently assigned to National Presto Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Lawrence A. Kalina, Richard C. Schoenert.
United States Patent | D444,994 |
Kalina , et al. | July 17, 2001 |
Inventors: | Kalina; Lawrence A. (Eau Claire, WI), Schoenert; Richard C. (Sherwood, OR) |
---|---|
Assignee: | National Presto Industries,
Inc. (Eau Claire, WI) |
Appl. No.: | D/133,274 |
Filed: | November 27, 2000 |
Current U.S. Class: | D7/360 |
Current International Class: | 0702 |
Field of Search: | ;D7/323,354-360 ;99/324,336,341,403 ;220/573.1 |
D182786 | May 1958 | Boldt |
D246686 | December 1977 | Boldt |
D250385 | November 1978 | Babros et al. |
D267388 | December 1982 | Spoeth, Jr. et al. |
D284257 | June 1986 | Greb et al. |
D292362 | October 1987 | Oh |
D300598 | April 1989 | Ueda et al. |
D376724 | December 1996 | Mendelson et al. |
4052590 | October 1977 | Anderl et al. |
4115918 | September 1978 | Anderl et al. |
Photographs of a FRY DADDY.RTM. deep fryer by National Presto Industries, Inc. . Copy of U.S. Design application No. 29/117,211. U.S. Pat. No. D. 431,150.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.