U.S. patent number D440,718 [Application Number D/115,568] was granted by the patent office on 2001-04-17 for toy pacifier for dogs. This patent grant is currently assigned to Happy Dog Toys, LLC. Invention is credited to John P. Florance.
United States Patent | D440,718 |
Florance | April 17, 2001 |
Inventors: | Florance; John P. (Phoenix, AZ) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Happy Dog Toys, LLC (Tempe,
AZ) |
Appl. No.: | D/115,568 |
Filed: | December 16, 1999 |
Current U.S. Class: | D30/160 |
Current International Class: | 3099 |
Field of Search: | ;D30/160 ;119/706-711 ;D24/194 ;606/234-236 ;D21/406,408 ;473/424,590 |
D339084 | September 1993 | Ehrenhalt |
D356157 | March 1995 | Harrison et al. |
D356354 | March 1995 | Killion |
D359147 | June 1995 | Hotta et al. |
D405842 | February 1999 | Palardis |
D408948 | April 1999 | Huettner et al. |
2944817 | July 1960 | Stiller |
3214166 | October 1965 | Gaudet |
3267937 | August 1966 | Verschoor |
4321888 | March 1982 | Topliffe |
4884807 | December 1989 | Welch |
5265559 | November 1993 | Borell |
5351652 | October 1994 | Budman et al. |
5961406 | October 1999 | Hass |
6063107 | May 2000 | Wexler |
6112703 | September 2000 | Handelsman |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.