Sprayer device
Guo April 17, 2
U.S. patent number D440,629 [Application Number D/125,807] was granted by the patent office on 2001-04-17 for sprayer device. Invention is credited to Wen Li Guo.
| United States Patent | D440,629 |
| Guo | April 17, 2001 |
Sprayer device
Claims
The ornamental design for a sprayer device, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Guo; Wen Li (Wein Gin Tsuen, Fang Yuan Hsiang, Chang Hua Hsien, TW) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/125,807 |
| Filed: | June 30, 2000 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D23/216 |
| Current International Class: | 2301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/241-216 ;239/240-242 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D282769 | February 1986 | Lemkin |
| D371596 | July 1996 | Simonetti |
| D383193 | September 1997 | Heren et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Baxley; Charles E.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a sprayer device showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof, the opposite end being identical in appearance;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a right side elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 