Toe opener
Ikeda March 27, 2
U.S. patent number D439,704 [Application Number D/106,096] was granted by the patent office on 2001-03-27 for toe opener. Invention is credited to Hisao Ikeda.
| United States Patent | D439,704 |
| Ikeda | March 27, 2001 |
Toe opener
Claims
The ornamental design for toe opener, as shown.
| Inventors: | Ikeda; Hisao (Narashino-shi,Chiba, JP) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/106,096 |
| Filed: | June 8, 1999 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Apr 26, 1999 [JP] | 11-10689 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D28/57 |
| Current International Class: | 2802 |
| Field of Search: | ;D28/56,57 ;132/72,73 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D393931 | April 1998 | Rue |
| D415858 | October 1999 | Funatogawa |
| 2506308 | May 1950 | Maynier |
| 2517232 | August 1950 | Patulski |
| 2595640 | May 1952 | Chirstopoulos |
| 2628623 | February 1953 | Reid |
| 972346 | Jan 1997 | JP | |||
| 992894 | Oct 1997 | JP | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Nilles & Nilles SC
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of a toe opener showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 