Pot
Thakur March 20, 2
U.S. patent number D439,104 [Application Number D/126,535] was granted by the patent office on 2001-03-20 for pot. Invention is credited to Doulat Kumar Thakur.
| United States Patent | D439,104 |
| Thakur | March 20, 2001 |
Pot
Claims
The ornamental design for a pot, as shown.
| Inventors: | Thakur; Doulat Kumar (Taipei, TW) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/126,535 |
| Filed: | July 17, 2000 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/360 |
| Current International Class: | 0702 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/323,354-361 ;99/324 ;220/573.1,573.2,752 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D160070 | September 1950 | Carr |
| D218564 | September 1970 | Stevens |
| D221096 | July 1971 | Tevolitz et al. |
| D252311 | July 1979 | Prussi |
| D270030 | August 1983 | Catry |
| D282135 | January 1986 | McClelland |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Dellett and Walters
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a pot, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a left elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 6 is top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 