Floating key ring
Riley March 6, 2
U.S. patent number D438,373 [Application Number D/083,509] was granted by the patent office on 2001-03-06 for floating key ring. Invention is credited to Phil Riley.
| United States Patent | D438,373 |
| Riley | March 6, 2001 |
Floating key ring
Claims
The ornamental design for a floating key ring, as shown.
| Inventors: | Riley; Phil (Lake Oswego, OR) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/083,509 |
| Filed: | November 15, 1997 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/207 |
| Current International Class: | 0301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D3/207-212 ;24/3.6 ;70/456 R-460/ ;D20/18-20 ;D19/20,21 ;150/135 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D238976 | February 1976 | Dolas |
| D308762 | June 1990 | Barnes et al. |
| D394151 | May 1998 | MacDonald |
| D404561 | January 1999 | MacDonald |
| 4166489 | September 1979 | Lemelson |
| 4706477 | November 1987 | Rousseau |
| 5069050 | December 1991 | Chen |
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view.
FIG. 2 is a right side view. The left side is a mirror image.
FIG. 3 is a front view.
FIG. 4 is a top view. The bottom view is a mirror image; and,
FIG. 5 is a back view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 