U.S. patent number D431,393 [Application Number D/112,332] was granted by the patent office on 2000-10-03 for dresser. This patent grant is currently assigned to Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Guy A. Walters, III, Daniel David Wistehuff, Sr..
United States Patent | D431,393 |
Walters, III , et al. | October 3, 2000 |
Inventors: | Walters, III; Guy A. (High Point, NC), Wistehuff, Sr.; Daniel David (Greensboro, NC) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Thomasville Furniture Industries,
Inc. (Thomasville, NC) |
Appl. No.: | D/112,332 |
Filed: | October 14, 1999 |
Current U.S. Class: | D6/671.1 |
Current International Class: | 0604 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/432-448 ;312/204 |
D234177 | January 1975 | Keller |
D394171 | May 1998 | De Blaay |
D401082 | November 1998 | O'Hare |
D412413 | August 1999 | Keller et al. |
Furniture Today, Galleria Dresser, p. 14, May 22, 2000. . Henredon brochure, Carlyle Collection, believed to be prior art. . Chest, St. Laurent Marble Top, source unknown, believed to be prior art. . Photo from magazine, source unknown, believed to be prior art. . Storage Chest, Collector's Cherry Collection, Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc., p. 13, believed to be prior art.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.