Eyewear temple
Arnette September 5, 2
U.S. patent number D430,591 [Application Number D/113,239] was granted by the patent office on 2000-09-05 for eyewear temple. This patent grant is currently assigned to Luxottica Leasing S.p.A.. Invention is credited to Kip Arnette.
| United States Patent | D430,591 |
| Arnette | September 5, 2000 |
Eyewear temple
Claims
The ornamental design for eyewear temple, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Arnette; Kip (South Laguna Beach, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Luxottica Leasing S.p.A.
(Agordo, IT) |
| Appl. No.: | D/113,239 |
| Filed: | November 1, 1999 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102934 | Apr 5, 1999 | ||||
| 080482 | Dec 10, 1997 | Des. 411560 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D16/335 |
| Current International Class: | 1606 |
| Field of Search: | ;D16/300-330,335,337 ;D29/109,110 ;351/41,44,51,52,111,158 ;2/448 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D191229 | August 1961 | Boxer |
| D204320 | April 1966 | Carmichael |
| D205419 | August 1966 | Griss |
| D217393 | April 1970 | Simon |
| D227407 | June 1973 | Marchi |
| D243012 | January 1977 | Loughner |
| D244196 | May 1977 | Zimmerman |
| D245168 | July 1977 | Zimmerman |
| D246791 | December 1977 | Shindler |
| D253597 | December 1979 | Solomon |
| D284769 | July 1986 | MacWilliamson |
| D285092 | August 1986 | Baum |
| D294951 | March 1988 | Shelton et al. |
| D302559 | August 1989 | Samuel |
| D313236 | December 1990 | Mackay |
| D319647 | September 1991 | Wilson |
| D327081 | June 1992 | Nakamura et al. |
| D347014 | May 1994 | Arnette |
| D354505 | January 1995 | Francavilla |
| D358160 | May 1995 | Conway |
| D363504 | October 1995 | Arnette |
| D369375 | April 1996 | Jannard et al. |
| D371382 | July 1996 | Berthet-Bondet |
| D371383 | July 1996 | Goldman |
| D372726 | August 1996 | Simioni |
| D372929 | August 1996 | Conway |
| D374025 | September 1996 | Canavan |
| D390864 | February 1998 | Mage |
| D392307 | March 1998 | Wilson |
| D392665 | March 1998 | Mage |
| D400229 | October 1998 | Arnette |
| D401610 | November 1998 | Flanagan |
| D403343 | December 1998 | Flanagan |
| D403690 | January 1999 | Arnette |
| D403691 | January 1999 | Flanagan |
| D407736 | April 1999 | Simioni |
| D409645 | May 1999 | Lin |
| 2824309 | February 1958 | Fleming |
| 4877320 | October 1989 | Holden |
| 5541674 | July 1996 | Jannard |
| 5565937 | October 1996 | Lee et al. |
| DM/035 462 | Feb 1996 | XH | |||
| DM/036 174 | Apr 1996 | XH | |||
| DM/037 064 | Jul 1996 | XH | |||
| DM/039 412 | Mar 1997 | XH | |||
Other References
|
Arnette Source Book 1997 "CATFISH", "STEEL CATFISH". . U.S. application No. 29/062,691, filed Nov. 21, 1996.. |
Primary Examiner: Barkai; Raphael
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn PLLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of an eyewear temple showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the side opposite that shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view of the temple of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 