Abdominal exerciser
Sealy June 6, 2
U.S. patent number D426,275 [Application Number D/062,769] was granted by the patent office on 2000-06-06 for abdominal exerciser. Invention is credited to John A Sealy.
| United States Patent | D426,275 |
| Sealy | June 6, 2000 |
Abdominal exerciser
Claims
The ornamental design for an abdominal exerciser, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Sealy; John A (Boothwyn, PA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/062,769 |
| Filed: | November 25, 1996 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/692; D21/684 |
| Current International Class: | 2102 |
| Field of Search: | ;482/122,123,124,125,126,127,140 ;D21/662,692,684 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D330739 | November 1992 | Yang |
| 1680901 | August 1928 | Meyer |
| 4629186 | December 1986 | Aldridge |
| 4861022 | August 1989 | Boatcallie |
| 5026050 | June 1991 | Leung et al. |
| 5413548 | May 1995 | Hoffman |
| 1718711 | Mar 1992 | SU | |||
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of an abdominal exerciser showing my new design, wherein the bottom plan view is a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 