Luminaire
Compton May 30, 2
U.S. patent number D426,010 [Application Number D/107,893] was granted by the patent office on 2000-05-30 for luminaire. This patent grant is currently assigned to Kim Lighting, Inc.. Invention is credited to Wayne W. Compton.
| United States Patent | D426,010 |
| Compton | May 30, 2000 |
Luminaire
Claims
The ornamental design for a luminaire, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Compton; Wayne W. (Chino Hills, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Kim Lighting, Inc. (City of
Industry, CA) |
| Appl. No.: | D/107,893 |
| Filed: | July 15, 1999 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D26/67 |
| Current International Class: | 2605 |
| Field of Search: | ;D26/67-71 ;362/153,153.1,431 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D399328 | October 1998 | Compton |
| D402386 | December 1998 | Compton |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lyon & Lyon LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a first side elevational view, the reverse side being the same;
FIG. 2 is a top view,
FIG. 3 is a second side elevational view, the opposite side being the same,
FIG. 4 is a bottom view, and,
FIG. 5 is an enlarged fragmentary top perspective view, the luminaire being fragmentarily shown for convenience of illustration.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 