U.S. patent number D425,709 [Application Number D/101,308] was granted by the patent office on 2000-05-30 for camouflage pattern for sheet goods. Invention is credited to Clay A. Mathews, Randy L. Mathews.
United States Patent | D425,709 |
Mathews , et al. | May 30, 2000 |
Inventors: | Mathews; Clay A. (Victor, MT), Mathews; Randy L. (Victor, MT) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/101,308 |
Filed: | February 26, 1999 |
Current U.S. Class: | D5/66; D5/32; D5/43 |
Current International Class: | 0505 |
Field of Search: | ;D5/24,25,27,28,29,43,44,53,58,59,60,62,99 ;D6/595,604,606 ;D24/124 ;428/17,18,43,151,156,187,199,542.6,904.4,919 |
D48579 | February 1916 | Albrecht |
D66032 | November 1924 | Marwede |
D70788 | August 1926 | Fowler |
D200039 | January 1965 | Campbell |
D297076 | August 1988 | Kolpin et al. |
D299188 | January 1989 | Norton |
D299793 | February 1989 | Yacovella |
D324312 | March 1992 | Ferguson |
D326363 | May 1992 | Cooper |
D401096 | November 1998 | Wichser |
4656065 | April 1987 | Yacovella |
4865900 | September 1989 | Shannon et al. |
5675838 | October 1997 | Hollinger |
5727253 | March 1998 | Wilkinson |
5753323 | May 1998 | Andrus |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.