Decorative ruler
Danon April 11, 2
U.S. patent number D422,517 [Application Number D/110,131] was granted by the patent office on 2000-04-11 for decorative ruler. Invention is credited to Sandra R. Danon.
| United States Patent | D422,517 |
| Danon | April 11, 2000 |
Decorative ruler
Claims
The ornamental design for a decorative ruler, as shown.
| Inventors: | Danon; Sandra R. (Los Angeles, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/110,131 |
| Filed: | August 30, 1999 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D10/71 |
| Current International Class: | 1004 |
| Field of Search: | ;D10/71 ;33/483-494 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D190525 | June 1961 | Stroyman et al. |
| D369618 | May 1996 | Lichfield |
| 5588215 | December 1996 | Hart |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kelly Bauersfeld Lowry & Kelley, LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a top, end and side perspective view of a decorative ruler embodying my design;
FIG. 2 is an end elevational view thereof, the opposite end view being a mirror image;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof, the opposite side elevational view being a mirror image;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 